On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 08:44:58PM +1300, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 30 September 2014 10:24, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > I suspect that check_recirc() and check_uid() should pass
> > DPIF_FP_MODIFY as well as DPIF_FP_CREATE, just in case a previous run
> > of OVS was killed at just the right time to le
On 30 September 2014 10:24, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> I suspect that check_recirc() and check_uid() should pass
> DPIF_FP_MODIFY as well as DPIF_FP_CREATE, just in case a previous run
> of OVS was killed at just the right time to leave a straggler probe
> flow in the datapath.
>
I checked on this, and
On 30 September 2014 10:24, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:28:17PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > One of the limiting factors on the number of flows that can be supported
> > in the datapath is the overhead of assembling flow dump messages in the
> > datapath. This patch modifies t
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:28:17PM +1200, Joe Stringer wrote:
> One of the limiting factors on the number of flows that can be supported
> in the datapath is the overhead of assembling flow dump messages in the
> datapath. This patch modifies the flow_dump interface to allow
> revalidators to skip
One of the limiting factors on the number of flows that can be supported
in the datapath is the overhead of assembling flow dump messages in the
datapath. This patch modifies the flow_dump interface to allow
revalidators to skip dumping the key, mask and actions from the
datapath, by making use of
