On 4 April 2016 at 11:20, Joe Stringer wrote:
> On 30 March 2016 at 19:55, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:21:13AM +1300, Joe Stringer wrote:
>>> Using the action ct(commit,set_field:0x1/0x1->ct_mark), ie, specifying a
>>> mask, would previously overwrite the entire ct_mark field r
On 30 March 2016 at 19:55, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:21:13AM +1300, Joe Stringer wrote:
>> Using the action ct(commit,set_field:0x1/0x1->ct_mark), ie, specifying a
>> mask, would previously overwrite the entire ct_mark field rather than
>> modifying only the specified bits. Fix
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 12:21:13AM +1300, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Using the action ct(commit,set_field:0x1/0x1->ct_mark), ie, specifying a
> mask, would previously overwrite the entire ct_mark field rather than
> modifying only the specified bits. Fix the issue.
>
> Fixes: 8e53fe8cf7a1 ("Add connect
Using the action ct(commit,set_field:0x1/0x1->ct_mark), ie, specifying a
mask, would previously overwrite the entire ct_mark field rather than
modifying only the specified bits. Fix the issue.
Fixes: 8e53fe8cf7a1 ("Add connection tracking mark support.")
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer
---
v2: Remove
