On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:58:46AM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Let's use a better name for the new files, say odp-execute.[ch], and
> use an appropriately prefixed name for the function,
> e.g. odp_actions_execute().
Thanks, I have renamed the files as odp-execute.[ch],
and prefixed the functions wi
Let's use a better name for the new files, say odp-execute.[ch], and
use an appropriately prefixed name for the function,
e.g. odp_actions_execute(). It would also be acceptable to break
action-related code out of odp-util.[ch] and put all of it in a new
odp-actions.[ch].
Some more comments:
On
This moves generic action execution code out of lib/dpif-netedev.c
and into a new file, lib/execute-actions.c.
This is in preparation for using execute_set_action()
in lib/odp-util.c to handle recirculation/
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman
---
v9
* As suggested by Jesse Gross
- Follow the conventi
