On Sep 25, 2014, at 7:52 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
> After some testing, here’s my ack.
>
> Acked-by: Daniele Venturino
Pushed to master, thanks!
Jarno
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index d3e527a..d3973e5 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto
After some testing, here’s my ack.
Acked-by: Daniele Venturino
ha scritto:
>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:26 AM, Daniele Venturino
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Il giorno 11/set/2014, alle ore 19:09, Jarno Rajahalme
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Daniele Venturino
>>> wrote:
>>
On Sep 19, 2014, at 8:26 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
>
> Il giorno 11/set/2014, alle ore 19:09, Jarno Rajahalme
> ha scritto:
>
>>
>> On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Daniele Venturino
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 22:04, Daniele Venturino
>>> ha scritto:
>>>
Il giorno 11/set/2014, alle ore 19:09, Jarno Rajahalme
ha scritto:
>
> On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Daniele Venturino
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 22:04, Daniele Venturino
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>>
>>> Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 20:07, Jarno Rajahalme
>>> ha scri
On Sep 11, 2014, at 5:49 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
>
> Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 22:04, Daniele Venturino
> ha scritto:
>
>>
>> Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 20:07, Jarno Rajahalme
>> ha scritto:
>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Daniele Venturino
>>> wrote:
>>>
Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 22:04, Daniele Venturino
ha scritto:
>
> Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 20:07, Jarno Rajahalme
> ha scritto:
>
>>
>> On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Daniele Venturino
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review!
>>> It would be nice to have an Acked-by from
Il giorno 09/set/2014, alle ore 20:07, Jarno Rajahalme
ha scritto:
>
> On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Daniele Venturino
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Thanks for the review!
>> It would be nice to have an Acked-by from you to the series. However, I plan
>> to squash trivial CodingStyle fixes in before pus
On Sep 9, 2014, at 3:53 AM, Daniele Venturino
wrote:
>
> Thanks for the review!
> It would be nice to have an Acked-by from you to the series. However, I plan
> to squash trivial CodingStyle fixes in before pushing the series to master.
> Also, I’ll add a News item stating that experimental
>
>
> Thanks for the review!
> It would be nice to have an Acked-by from you to the series. However, I
> plan to squash trivial CodingStyle fixes in before pushing the series to
> master. Also, I’ll add a News item stating that experimental RSTP is added,
> and more compliance and interoperability
Thanks for the review!
It would be nice to have an Acked-by from you to the series. However, I plan to
squash trivial CodingStyle fixes in before pushing the series to master. Also,
I’ll add a News item stating that experimental RSTP is added, and more
compliance and interoperability testing is
I looked and applied the patches. They’re good to me, I just have some
notes on patch 13/18 and 16/18.
@@ -108,9 +121,9 @@ process_received_bpdu(struct rstp_port *p, const void
> *bpdu, size_t bpdu_size)
> memcpy(&p->received_bpdu_buffer, bpdu, sizeof(struct rstp_bpdu));
> rstp
I took my time starting the review, so I decided address issues as I
see them rather than just comment on them.
The first patch of this series is a minimally rebased version of the
v5 sent on ovs-dev on June 12th, 2014. Rest of the series is my
proposal for fixes and enhancements.
I could have r
12 matches
Mail list logo
