On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jarno Rajahalme
>> wrote:
>>> When userspace inserts masked flows, it is not necessary to demand
>>> that flows matching in a known ethertype also mus
On Sep 22, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> When userspace inserts masked flows, it is not necessary to demand
>> that flows matching in a known ethertype also must have the
>> corresponding key, as a missing key will be automatica
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> When userspace inserts masked flows, it is not necessary to demand
> that flows matching in a known ethertype also must have the
> corresponding key, as a missing key will be automatically wildcarded.
>
> For example, if a drop flow dropping
When userspace inserts masked flows, it is not necessary to demand
that flows matching in a known ethertype also must have the
corresponding key, as a missing key will be automatically wildcarded.
For example, if a drop flow dropping all UDP packets is installed,
this patch allows the userspace ap
