On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:48:58PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:09:25PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:25:47PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:01:09PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > > w
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 07:09:25PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:25:47PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:01:09PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
> > wrote:
> > > IGMP packets need to take the slow path. Otherwise, packets
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:25:47PM -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:01:09PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> > IGMP packets need to take the slow path. Otherwise, packets that match
> > the same flow will not be processed by OVS. That might prevent OVS from
> >
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:01:09PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> IGMP packets need to take the slow path. Otherwise, packets that match
> the same flow will not be processed by OVS. That might prevent OVS from
> updating the expire time for entries already in the mdb, but also to
>
IGMP packets need to take the slow path. Otherwise, packets that match
the same flow will not be processed by OVS. That might prevent OVS from
updating the expire time for entries already in the mdb, but also to
lose packets with different addresses in the payload.
Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de So
