On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 01:48:06PM -0800, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> With a note and a question below:
>
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Thanks for the review.
> I’m curious if there is a specific reason to define
> ofpbuf_const_initializer() as an inline function, and keep the
> OFPBUF_STUB_INITIALI
With a note and a question below:
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 12:34 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> A number of times I've looked at code and thought that it would be easier
> to understand if I could write an initializer instead of
> ofpbuf_use_const(). This commit adds a functi
A number of times I've looked at code and thought that it would be easier
to understand if I could write an initializer instead of
ofpbuf_use_const(). This commit adds a function for that purpose and
adapts a lot of code to use it, in the places where I thought it made
the code better.
In theory
