On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Alexei Starovoitov
>> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
>>> index c323567..ffa429a 100644
>>> ---
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
>> index c323567..ffa429a 100644
>> --- a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
>> +++ b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
>>
On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> diff --git a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
> index c323567..ffa429a 100644
> --- a/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
> +++ b/net/openvswitch/dp_notify.c
> @@ -59,15 +59,9 @@ void ovs_dp_notify_wq(struct work_struct
The combination of two commits:
commit 8e4e1713e4
("openvswitch: Simplify datapath locking.")
commit 2537b4dd0a
("openvswitch:: link upper device for port devices")
introduced a bug where upper_dev wasn't unlinked upon
netdev_unregister notification
The following steps:
modprobe openvswitch
