On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
>> STT implementation I saw performance improvements with linearizing
>> skb for SLUB case. So following patch skips zero copy operation
>> for such a case.
>> First change is to reassem
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Pravin B Shelar wrote:
> STT implementation I saw performance improvements with linearizing
> skb for SLUB case. So following patch skips zero copy operation
> for such a case.
> First change is to reassembly code where in-order packet is merged
> to head, if ther
STT implementation I saw performance improvements with linearizing
skb for SLUB case. So following patch skips zero copy operation
for such a case.
First change is to reassembly code where in-order packet is merged
to head, if there is no room to merge it then combined packet is
linearized.
Second
