Guru Shetty wrote on 08/24/2016 03:57:41 PM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 08/24/2016 03:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] ovn-controller: Back out
> incremental processing
>
> On 24 August 2016 at 11:12, Ryan Mo
On 24 August 2016 at 11:12, Ryan Moats wrote:
>
>
>
> Guru Shetty wrote on 08/24/2016 01:07:47 PM:
>
> > From: Guru Shetty
> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> > Cc: ovs dev
> > Date: 08/24/2016 01:08 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] ovn-co
On 24 August 2016 at 11:03, Ryan Moats wrote:
>
> Guru Shetty wrote on 08/24/2016 12:46:55 PM:
>
> > From: Guru Shetty
> > To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> > Cc: ovs dev
> > Date: 08/24/2016 12:47 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] ovn-controll
Guru Shetty wrote on 08/24/2016 01:07:47 PM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 08/24/2016 01:08 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] ovn-controller: Back out
> incremental processing
>
> On 24 August 2016 at 11:03, Rya
Guru Shetty wrote on 08/24/2016 12:46:55 PM:
> From: Guru Shetty
> To: Ryan Moats/Omaha/IBM@IBMUS
> Cc: ovs dev
> Date: 08/24/2016 12:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v3] ovn-controller: Back out
> incremental processing
>
> On 23 August 2016 at 22:40, Ry
On 23 August 2016 at 22:40, Ryan Moats wrote:
> As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
> in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
> This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
> processing, along with the persisting of OF flows,
> logical ports and m
As [1] indicates, incremental processing hasn't resulted
in an improvement worth the complexity it has added.
This patch backs out all of the code specific to incremental
processing, along with the persisting of OF flows,
logical ports and multicast groups.
[1] http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev
