On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:47 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 07:21:18AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> After a quick analysis, in most cases the access to refcounted objects
>> is clearly protected either with an explicit lock/mutex, or RCU. there
>> are only a few places where I lef
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 07:21:18AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> After a quick analysis, in most cases the access to refcounted objects
> is clearly protected either with an explicit lock/mutex, or RCU. there
> are only a few places where I left a call to ovs_refcount_unref().
> Upon closer analy
After a quick analysis, in most cases the access to refcounted objects
is clearly protected either with an explicit lock/mutex, or RCU. there
are only a few places where I left a call to ovs_refcount_unref().
Upon closer analysis it may well be that those could also use the
relaxed form.
Signed-of
