On 11 August 2015 at 11:13, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> -if (!keep) {
>> +if (result == UKEY_DELETE) {
>> delete_op_init(udpif, &ops[n_ops++], ukey);
>> +} else if (result == UKEY_MODIFY) {
>> +ofpbuf_delete(ukey->actions);
>> +
On 10 August 2015 at 18:46, Ethan J. Jackson wrote:
> exit:
> -if (ok) {
> +if (result != UKEY_DELETE) {
> ukey->reval_seq = reval_seq;
> }
> -if (netflow && !ok) {
> +if (netflow && result != UKEY_DELETE) {
> netflow_flow_clear(netflow, &flow);
> }
I
> On Aug 10, 2015, at 6:46 PM, Ethan J. Jackson wrote:
>
> From: Ethan Jackson
>
> There are certain use cases (such as bond rebalancing) where a
> datapath flow's actions may change, while it's wildcard pattern
> remains the same. Before this patch, revalidators would note the
> change, dele
From: Ethan Jackson
There are certain use cases (such as bond rebalancing) where a
datapath flow's actions may change, while it's wildcard pattern
remains the same. Before this patch, revalidators would note the
change, delete the flow, and wait for the handlers to install an
updated version. T
