Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 05/12] ofp-actions: Better support OXM in Copy-Field action.

2014-10-07 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Oct 06, 2014 at 12:00:30PM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > The OpenFlow 1.5 (draft) Copy-Field action has two OXM headers, one after > > the other. Until now, Open vSwitch has implemented these as a pair of > > ovs_be32 members, which meant that only 32-bit OXM could be supported. This

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 05/12] ofp-actions: Better support OXM in Copy-Field action.

2014-10-05 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> The OpenFlow 1.5 (draft) Copy-Field action has two OXM headers, one after > the other. Until now, Open vSwitch has implemented these as a pair of > ovs_be32 members, which meant that only 32-bit OXM could be supported. This > commit changes the implementation to use nx_pull_header(), which mean

[ovs-dev] [PATCH v2 05/12] ofp-actions: Better support OXM in Copy-Field action.

2014-09-30 Thread Ben Pfaff
The OpenFlow 1.5 (draft) Copy-Field action has two OXM headers, one after the other. Until now, Open vSwitch has implemented these as a pair of ovs_be32 members, which meant that only 32-bit OXM could be supported. This commit changes the implementation to use nx_pull_header(), which means that i