Yes, I figured it might be better pipeline the revision process to get things
through faster :-)
Jarno
On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It looks like you posted a v2 of just the beginning of the series also?
> I'll review those, then we can look at the rest of the series.
>
>
It looks like you posted a v2 of just the beginning of the series also?
I'll review those, then we can look at the rest of the series.
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 04:40:06PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Just to be clear, this is a v2 on the patch 12/12 of the series, due to the
> batching changes
Just to be clear, this is a v2 on the patch 12/12 of the series, due to the
batching changes Ethan just pushed. The 1-11 seem to still apply.
Jarno
On Jun 30, 2014, at 4:37 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Now that all the relevant classifier structures use RCU and internal
> mutual exclusion fo
Now that all the relevant classifier structures use RCU and internal
mutual exclusion for modifications, we can remove the fat-rwlock and
thus make the classifier lookups lockless.
As the readers are operating concurrently with the writers, a
concurrent reader may or may not see a new rule being a
