Thanks for review.
I sent new version of patch.
http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/dev/2015-August/058926.html
Best regards, Ilya Maximets.
On 17.08.2015 19:45, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> Sorry about the long wait.
>
> I think this is the right direction, I like the idea of having a thread
> lo
Sorry about the long wait.
I think this is the right direction, I like the idea of having a thread
local map of the txqs. It will allow us to assign the txqs in a more
sophisticated way.
I see some unit tests failing with this patch applied. Could you try
running the testsuite with 'make check'
ping.
On 06.08.2015 17:32, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> Currently tx_qid is equal to pmd->core_id. This leads to unexpected
> behavior if pmd-cpu-mask different from '/(0*)(1|3|7)?(f*)/',
> e.g. if core_ids are not sequential, or doesn't start from 0, or both.
>
> Example:
> starting 2 pmd thread
Currently tx_qid is equal to pmd->core_id. This leads to unexpected
behavior if pmd-cpu-mask different from '/(0*)(1|3|7)?(f*)/',
e.g. if core_ids are not sequential, or doesn't start from 0, or both.
Example:
starting 2 pmd threads with 1 port, 2 rxqs per port,
pmd-cpu-mask =
