Thanks Han,
I'm going to post them soon, gonna be in series.
Alex Wang,
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Han Zhou wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> I had a simple test with your V3 patch, and the improvements are
> obvious.
>
> In my 32 core machine I ran 10 handler threads, comparing hping3 test
> resul
Thanks very much for the review!~ ;D
Please see my reply inline,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> > upcall.cmd = OVS_PACKET_CMD_MISS;
> > upcall.key = &key;
> > upcall.userdata = NULL;
> > - upcall.portid = p
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Alex Wang wrote:
> This commit removes the 'dispatcher' thread by allowing 'handler'
> threads to read upcalls directly from dpif. vport in dpif will
> open netlink sockets for each handler and will use the 5-tuple
> hash from the missed packet to choose which so
Thanks a lot for pointing it out, Yamamoto,
I failed to cover this. will work on solving it.
Alex Wang,
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 6:36 PM, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote:
> > This commit removes the 'dispatcher' thread by allowing 'handler'
> > threads to read upcalls directly from dpif. vport in dpif
> This commit removes the 'dispatcher' thread by allowing 'handler'
> threads to read upcalls directly from dpif. vport in dpif will
> open netlink sockets for each handler and will use the 5-tuple
> hash from the missed packet to choose which socket (handler) to
> send the upcall.
>
> This patch
