Thx for the reviews, Ben and Joe,
Applied the patch to master, branch-2.[0,1,3]
Alex Wang,
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 2:43 AM, Joe Stringer
wrote:
> I took another read through, minor nitpicks if you haven't pushed the
> patch yet:-
>
>
> On 16 July 2014 17:21, Alex Wang wrote:
>
>> + * FWD:
I took another read through, minor nitpicks if you haven't pushed the patch
yet:-
On 16 July 2014 17:21, Alex Wang wrote:
>
> + * FWD: the port should forward any incomging non-stp-bpdu
> + * packets.
>
incomging -> incoming
bpdu -> BPDU
+ * TX_BPDU/RX_BPDU: th
Acked-by: Joe Stringer
On 16 July 2014 17:21, Alex Wang wrote:
> Commit 0d1cee123a84 (stp: Fix bpdu tx problem in listening state)
> makes ovs drop the stp bpdu packets if stp is not enabled on the
> input port. However, when pif bridge is used and stp is enabled
> on the integration bridge.
Commit 0d1cee123a84 (stp: Fix bpdu tx problem in listening state)
makes ovs drop the stp bpdu packets if stp is not enabled on the
input port. However, when pif bridge is used and stp is enabled
on the integration bridge. The flow translation of stp bpdu
packets will go through a level of resubmi
