On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:29:25AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > > This is unpolished but it shows the approach I have in mind.
> > > Sending out for comments on the approach.
> > >
>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:50:42AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> >> ---
> >> This is unpolished but it shows the approach I have in mind.
> >> Sending out for comments on th
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 08:29:25AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > This is unpolished but it shows the approach I have in mind.
> > Sending out for comments on the approach.
> >
> I am fine with the approach. The two negatives I see with this
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 8:29 AM, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> ---
>> This is unpolished but it shows the approach I have in mind.
>> Sending out for comments on the approach.
>>
> I am fine with the approach. The two negatives I see with this:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> ---
> This is unpolished but it shows the approach I have in mind.
> Sending out for comments on the approach.
>
I am fine with the approach. The two negatives I see with this:
* If /tmp is cleaned up routinely, we will loose the information. If
---
This is unpolished but it shows the approach I have in mind.
Sending out for comments on the approach.
diff --git a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
index 20e1964..d87360a 100644
--- a/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
+++ b/ovsdb/ovsdb-server.c
@@ -81,8 +81,14 @@ struct add_remote_aux {
st
