On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:01 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 02:48 AM, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Pravin B Shelar
>>
>> Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
>> Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel® DPDK vSwitch
>> where DPDK datapath switching
On 01/28/2014 02:48 AM, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
From: Pravin B Shelar
Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel® DPDK vSwitch
where DPDK datapath switching is done in saparate process. This
patch adds support for DPDK type p
On 01/28/2014 07:17 PM, Pravin Shelar wrote:
Right, version mismatch will not work. API provided by DPDK are not
stable, So OVS has to be built for different releases for now.
I do not see how we can fix it from OVS side. DPDK needs to
standardize API, Actually OVS also needs more API, like DPDK
Hi Pravin,
>> Few feature questions:
- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases.
At this point I wanted to get basic DPDK support in OVS, once that is
done
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 03:47 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
>>
>> Hi Pravin,
>>
>> Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
>>
>> Few feature questions:
>>- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
>>- what's about IPsec support
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 7:48 AM, Thomas Graf wrote:
> On 01/28/2014 02:48 AM, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Pravin B Shelar
>>
>> Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
>> Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel® DPDK vSwitch
>> where DPDK datapath switching
Hi Vincent,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Vincent JARDIN
wrote:
> Hi Pravin,
>
> Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
>
> Few feature questions:
> - what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
> - what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
> I do not
On 01/28/2014 03:47 PM, Vincent JARDIN wrote:
Hi Pravin,
Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
Few feature questions:
- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
I would like to extend this question to
On 01/28/2014 02:48 AM, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
From: Pravin B Shelar
Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel® DPDK vSwitch
where DPDK datapath switching is done in saparate process. This
patch adds support for DPDK type p
Hi Pravin,
Yes, it is a good integration with http://dpdk.org
Few feature questions:
- what's about the vNIC supports (toward the guests)?
- what's about IPsec support (VxLAN over IPsec for instance)?
I do not understand how your patch will solve those 2 cases.
This is based a patch from G
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 8:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:48:35PM -0800, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
>> From: Pravin B Shelar
>>
>> Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
>> Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel?? DPDK vSwitch
>> where DPDK data
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 05:48:35PM -0800, pshe...@nicira.com wrote:
> From: Pravin B Shelar
>
> Following patch adds DPDK netdev-class to userspace datapath.
> Approach taken in this patch differs from Intel?? DPDK vSwitch
> where DPDK datapath switching is done in saparate process. This
> patch
12 matches
Mail list logo
