On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:48:42AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I've supplied an incremental below. The series has
> changed enough that I'm going to resend the entire thing for completeness.
Thanks, I would appreciate that.
> > Let's add a requirement that pad[] in stru
Thanks for the review. I've supplied an incremental below. The series has
changed enough that I'm going to resend the entire thing for completeness.
> Let's add a requirement that pad[] in struct nx_action_output_reg be
> all-bytes-zero, in case we want to extend it later.
I was wondering about
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:21:43PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> The NXAST_OUTPUT_REG outputs to the OpenFlow port contained in a
> supplied NXM field.
I think that the NEWS item should say that we've added an OpenFlow
extension to output to the port given in a field, instead of just
saying that "
> The NXAST_OUTPUT_REG outputs to the OpenFlow port contained in a
> supplied NXM field.
This should read:
The NXAST_OUTPUT_REG action outputs to the OpenFlow port contained
in a supplied NXM field.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://
The NXAST_OUTPUT_REG outputs to the OpenFlow port contained in a
supplied NXM field.
---
NEWS |2 ++
include/openflow/nicira-ext.h | 31 ++-
lib/ofp-parse.c | 23 ++-
lib/ofp-print.c |8
