Thanks, I feel better about my understanding of the code now.
I'll compose a patch in the not to distant future.
On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 05:44:49PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Just an oversight. Feel free to fix it.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Sa
Just an oversight. Feel free to fix it.
Ethan
On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:42:06PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
>> ---
>> ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 69
>> +++-
>>
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:42:06PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
> ---
> ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 69
> +++-
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-d
> I wonder whether a rwlock is warranted here.
Probably. Ill leave that for when we go back and optimize.
Ethan
X-CudaMail-Whitelist-To: dev@openvswitch.org
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:42:06PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
I wonder whether a rwlock is warranted here.
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 69 +++-
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index 17bc12f..e2dcd3f 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
+++ b/ofproto
