Thanks!
This series has dragged on a while so I'll try to expedite review.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:58:00AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Thanks for the review. I have addressed all the comments, there is
> quite a nice additional clean-up in classifier_lookup(). In addition
> to the lookahea
Thanks for the review. I have addressed all the comments, there is quite a nice
additional clean-up in classifier_lookup(). In addition to the lookahead, I
also integrated the priority handling to an iterator. Will send v2 right away.
Jarno
On Jun 13, 2014, at 10:06 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> O
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 11:53:51AM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Factor out the priority vector code from the classifier.
>
> Making the classifier use RCU instead of locking requires parallel
> access to the priority vector, pointing to subtables in descending
> priority order. When a new subt
Factor out the priority vector code from the classifier.
Making the classifier use RCU instead of locking requires parallel
access to the priority vector, pointing to subtables in descending
priority order. When a new subtable is added, a new copy of the
priority vector is allocated, while the cu
