Looks good.
On 25 February 2014 15:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:55:35PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
> > Previously, we would clean up the ukeys whose flow was not seen in the
> > most recent dump, while leaving the flow in the datapath. In the
> > unlikely case that the data
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:55:35PM -0800, Joe Stringer wrote:
> Previously, we would clean up the ukeys whose flow was not seen in the
> most recent dump, while leaving the flow in the datapath. In the
> unlikely case that the datapath fails to dump a flow that still exists
> in the datapath, this
Previously, we would clean up the ukeys whose flow was not seen in the
most recent dump, while leaving the flow in the datapath. In the
unlikely case that the datapath fails to dump a flow that still exists
in the datapath, this would cause double-counting of those flow stats.
This is currently ve
