Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
---
ofproto/automake.mk | 2 +
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-ipfix.c | 126 +++
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-ipfix.h | 28 ++
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 25 +
ofproto/ofproto-provider.h | 8 +++
ofproto/ofpr
On Jan 17, 2013, at 4:08 PM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:00:20PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:19:45PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri,
On Jan 17, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
>
> The schema limits each bridge to at most one IPFIX collector. Is
> there an a priori reason why this is limited? It seems to me that one
> could
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:08:34PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:00:20PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:19:45PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:00:20PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:19:45PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrot
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 03:00:20PM -0800, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:19:45PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> > One more thing. sFlow and NetFlow configuration
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:19:45PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
>> > Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
>>
>> The schema limits each bridge to at most one IPFIX collector. Is
>> there an
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 02:19:45PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
>
> The schema limits each bridge to at most one IPFIX collector. Is
> there an a priori reason why this is limited? It seems to me that
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 09:55:43AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
The schema limits each bridge to at most one IPFIX collector. Is
there an a priori reason why this is limited? It seems to me that one
could want to send some samples to one set of collectors and oth
Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
---
ofproto/automake.mk | 2 +
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-ipfix.c | 126 +++
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-ipfix.h | 28 ++
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 25 +
ofproto/ofproto-provider.h | 8 +++
ofproto/ofpr
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 12:39:40PM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> >> +return di;
> >> +}
> >
> > In vswitch.ovsschema, I believe that we could limit obs_domain_id to the
> > 32-bit range, since it's a 32-bit value. Is it worthwhile to do so?
On Jan 4, 2013, at 10:31 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> +return di;
>> +}
>
> In vswitch.ovsschema, I believe that we could limit obs_domain_id to the
> 32-bit range, since it's a 32-bit value. Is it worthwhile to do so?
Good idea. I've done that, and done the changes you suggested for the other
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:52:11AM -0800, Romain Lenglet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
...
> +struct dpif_ipfix *
> +dpif_ipfix_create(void)
> +{
> +struct dpif_ipfix *di;
> +di = xcalloc(1, sizeof *di);
You can use xzalloc(x) instead of xcalloc(1, x);
> +return di;
> +}
Signed-off-by: Romain Lenglet
---
ofproto/automake.mk | 2 +
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-ipfix.c | 125 +++
ofproto/ofproto-dpif-ipfix.h | 28 ++
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 25 +
ofproto/ofproto-provider.h | 8 +++
ofproto/ofpr
14 matches
Mail list logo
