On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:41:43PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:36:39PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
>>>
>>> Should the tcpdump p
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 04:41:43PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:36:39PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
> >
> > Should the tcpdump patch check for the old and the new OpenFlow port?
> >
On Sep 24, 2013, at 2:11 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:36:39PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
>
> Should the tcpdump patch check for the old and the new OpenFlow port?
>
> There are many remaining hits for 6633 in the tree. I'd suggest
> updati
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 02:36:39PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
Should the tcpdump patch check for the old and the new OpenFlow port?
There are many remaining hits for 6633 in the tree. I'd suggest
updating at least lib/vconn-active.man, lib/vconn-passive.man,
util
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
---
include/openflow/openflow-common.h |3 ++-
lib/stream-ssl.c |6 +++---
lib/vconn-stream.c |4 ++--
lib/vconn.c|8
ofproto/connmgr.c |2 +-
third-party/ofp-tcpdu
