On 5 August 2015 at 11:08, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
>
>
> On 05/08/2015 18:44, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
>
>>Thanks for this Daniele.
>>
>>A couple of general things:
>>- "userspace testsuite" as a name, while accurate, is also perhaps
>>misleading as the unit tests are also userspace tests (and do
On 05/08/2015 18:44, "Joe Stringer" wrote:
>Thanks for this Daniele.
>
>A couple of general things:
>- "userspace testsuite" as a name, while accurate, is also perhaps
>misleading as the unit tests are also userspace tests (and don't
>require any special root privileges). I guess this class of
Thanks for this Daniele.
A couple of general things:
- "userspace testsuite" as a name, while accurate, is also perhaps
misleading as the unit tests are also userspace tests (and don't
require any special root privileges). I guess this class of tests
should be "system", in which case it would make
The new userspace-testsuite, which can be launched via `make
check-userspace`, reuses the kmod tests on the userspace datapath.
The userspace datapath is already tested by the main testsuite (and
that's not going to change), but having also the userspace-testsuite has
the following advantages:
*
