Looks Good.
Ethan
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 13:41, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> It's reasonable to want to dump a flow table with "dump-flows" and then
> later use that output as input to other commands that read flows, but until
> now that hasn't been directly possible because "dump-flows" adds extra
> fiel
It's reasonable to want to dump a flow table with "dump-flows" and then
later use that output as input to other commands that read flows, but until
now that hasn't been directly possible because "dump-flows" adds extra
fields that other commands reject on input. This changes the flow parser
to jus