Good point, I made the change.
Ethan
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 11:29 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:42:04PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
>
> In rule_destruct(), I think it would be better to destroy the mutex
> following complete_operation(). Who
On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 06:42:04PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
In rule_destruct(), I think it would be better to destroy the mutex
following complete_operation(). Who knows, that function might want
to eventually look at the statistics.
Acked-by: Ben Pfaff
__
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c | 13 +++--
ofproto/ofproto-dpif.h |6 --
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c b/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
index 1d3f4ca..439adf7 100644
--- a/ofproto/ofproto-dpif.c
+++ b/ofpr
