On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:50:26PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> > In find_dpif(), as a micro-optimization you could use
>> > HMAP_FOR_EACH_IN_BUCKET in place of HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH.
>>
>>
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 01:50:26PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > In find_dpif(), as a micro-optimization you could use
> > HMAP_FOR_EACH_IN_BUCKET in place of HMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH.
>
> You mean because comparing the ifindex is just as cheap
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:00:05PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Currently we publish several multicast groups for upcalls and let
>> userspace sockets subscribe to them. The benefit of this is mostly
>> that userspace is the one doing the subsc
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:43:48PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:00:05PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> >> Currently we publish several multicast groups for upcalls and let
> >> userspace sockets subscribe to them. ??The
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:00:05PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Currently we publish several multicast groups for upcalls and let
> userspace sockets subscribe to them. The benefit of this is mostly
> that userspace is the one doing the subscription - the actual
> multicast capability is not curren
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:00:05PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
>> Currently we publish several multicast groups for upcalls and let
>> userspace sockets subscribe to them. The benefit of this is mostly
>> that userspace is the one doing the subsc
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 03:00:05PM -0700, Jesse Gross wrote:
> Currently we publish several multicast groups for upcalls and let
> userspace sockets subscribe to them. The benefit of this is mostly
> that userspace is the one doing the subscription - the actual
> multicast capability is not curren
2011/9/19 Sébastien Riccio :
> Hi,
> Not really sure, but it seems this part of the patch is rejected against the
> git master tree
>
> On 20.09.2011 00:00, Jesse Gross wrote:
>>
>> len += nla_total_size(upcall_info->actions_len);
>>
>> user_skb = genlmsg_new(l
Hi,
Not really sure, but it seems this part of the patch is rejected against
the git master tree
On 20.09.2011 00:00, Jesse Gross wrote:
len += nla_total_size(upcall_info->actions_len);
user_skb = genlmsg_new(len, GFP_ATOMIC);
- if (!user_
Currently we publish several multicast groups for upcalls and let
userspace sockets subscribe to them. The benefit of this is mostly
that userspace is the one doing the subscription - the actual
multicast capability is not currently used and probably wouldn't be
even if we moved to a multiprocess
10 matches
Mail list logo
