On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:00:29AM +0800, lichu...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Chunhe Li
>
> In rethat OS, the service name is "openvswitch", providers also should
> be change to "openvswitch"
I don't see a reason for this change because:
1) You can't just remove from Provides because it may brea
> >Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 2:50 AM
> >To: Lichunhe
> >Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Liuyongan; dongdong (A); Qianhuibin
> >Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] rhel:Change service providers to
> >'openvswitch'
> >
> >On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:0
, October 17, 2014 2:50 AM
>To: Lichunhe
>Cc: dev@openvswitch.org; Liuyongan; dongdong (A); Qianhuibin
>Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] rhel:Change service providers to
>'openvswitch'
>
>On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:00:29AM +0800, lichu...@huawei.com wrote:
>&g
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 10:00:29AM +0800, lichu...@huawei.com wrote:
> From: Chunhe Li
>
> In rethat OS, the service name is "openvswitch", providers also should
> be change to "openvswitch"
>
> Signed-off-by: Chunhe Li
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong
The sign-off chain leaves me confused. The fir
From: Chunhe Li
In rethat OS, the service name is "openvswitch", providers also should
be change to "openvswitch"
Signed-off-by: Chunhe Li
Signed-off-by: Dongdong
---
rhel/etc_init.d_openvswitch | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rhel/etc_init.d_openvswitch b/
