Thanks, Ben. Incorporated changes and resubmitted patch set since the order
changed.
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Leo Alterman wrote:
> > lockfile_lock() accepts a timeout argument but, aside from unit tests
> > pertaining to timeou
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 05:52:58PM -0700, Leo Alterman wrote:
> lockfile_lock() accepts a timeout argument but, aside from unit tests
> pertaining to timeout, its value is always 0. Since this feature relies on
> a periodic SIGALRM signal, which is no longer a given after refactoring
> timeval.c, t
lockfile_lock() accepts a timeout argument but, aside from unit tests
pertaining to timeout, its value is always 0. Since this feature relies on
a periodic SIGALRM signal, which is no longer a given after refactoring
timeval.c, the cleanest solution is to just remove it.
Signed-off-by: Leo Alterma
