Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

> On May 6, 2014 at 4:27:23 PM, Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote: > >> For simple filtering rules, it might be possible to achieve similar >> by installing appropriate OpenFlow flows instead. > > I think you want another word after "similar". Maybe "results"? > >> If the use of a particular pa

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

>> > How about this? >> >> looks good to me. >> ("usefully use" sounds a little weird but i'm not an english speaker) > > It is a little weird. I like to use language that is as clear as > possible in the FAQ, because otherwise it tends to raise as many > questions as it answers. The word "usef

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

On May 6, 2014 at 4:27:23 PM, Ben Pfaff (b...@nicira.com) wrote: > For simple filtering rules, it might be possible to achieve similar > by installing appropriate OpenFlow flows instead. I think you want another word after "similar".  Maybe "results"? > If the use of a particular packet filter s

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:32:35AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:09:08AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:02:06AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> >> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> >> >> +Q:

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:09:08AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:02:06AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >> >> +Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules. >> >> >> + >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 08:09:08AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:02:06AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> >> +Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules. > >> >> + > >> >> +

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:02:06AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> >> +Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules. >> >> + >> >> +A: It's by design. Open vSwitch interacts with packets at a lower layer >>

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 09:02:06AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > >> +Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules. > >> + > >> +A: It's by design. Open vSwitch interacts with packets at a lower layer > >> +

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: >> +Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules. >> + >> +A: It's by design. Open vSwitch interacts with packets at a lower layer >> + than typical packet-filter implementations like iptables. >> + For simple

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 09:13:53AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > +Q: Open vSwitch does not seem to obey my packet filter rules. > + > +A: It's by design. Open vSwitch interacts with packets at a lower layer > + than typical packet-filter implementations like iptables. > + For simple filteri

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] FAQ: Mention packet filter incompatibility

Signed-off-by: YAMAMOTO Takashi --- FAQ | 13 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/FAQ b/FAQ index fc21af4..716c1de 100644 --- a/FAQ +++ b/FAQ @@ -676,6 +676,19 @@ A: On Linux kernels before 3.11, the OVS GRE module and Linux GRE module can then reload the OVS module