On Nov 19, 2014, at 12:21 PM, Daniele Venturino
wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On patch 14/17 there’s a little change to add, which I anticipated in my
> previous mail.
> bundle_move() expects two “struct ofbundle” as arguments. With the current
> patch the two tests pertaining the MAC learning shifti
Thanks!
On patch 14/17 there’s a little change to add, which I anticipated in my
previous mail.
bundle_move() expects two “struct ofbundle” as arguments. With the current
patch the two tests pertaining the MAC learning shifting fail.
I just tested the merged version and this seems to be a good s
Daniele,
Thanks for testing, pushed to master.
Jarno
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
>> The problem must be that the port number and the hash value get out of sync,
>> i.e., when the port number is changed. Please try the patch below on top of
>> your patch and check
Daniele,
Thanks for testing, pushed to master.
Jarno
On Nov 17, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
>> The problem must be that the port number and the hash value get out of sync,
>> i.e., when the port number is changed. Please try the patch below on top of
>> your patch and check
> The problem must be that the port number and the hash value get out of sync,
> i.e., when the port number is changed. Please try the patch below on top of
> your patch and check if you still have the same problem.
With your modifications pertaining the hashmap those tests passed.
I had to reve
On Nov 14, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
> Why lose the ‘_WITH_HASH’? It seems pointless to iterate over all the ports,
> when we just care of the port with the ‘port_number’?
>
> With the _WITH_HASH a test on learned addresses shifting fails. It seems like
> it doesn't even ente
>
> Why lose the ‘_WITH_HASH’? It seems pointless to iterate over all the
> ports, when we just care of the port with the ‘port_number’?
With the _WITH_HASH a test on learned addresses shifting fails. It seems
like it doesn't even enter the FOR_EACH cycle when the port_number is not
1, maybe ther
Daniele,
See comments inline.
Thanks!
Jarno
On Nov 6, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Daniele Venturino wrote:
> All MAC addresses previously learned on a Root Port can be moved to an
> Alternate Port that becomes the new Root Port; i.e., Dynamic Filtering
> Entries for those addresses may
All MAC addresses previously learned on a Root Port can be moved to an
Alternate Port that becomes the new Root Port; i.e., Dynamic Filtering
Entries for those addresses may be modified to show the new Root Port as
their source, reducing the need to flood frames when recover
