Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 10/17] ofp-actions: Better support OXM in Copy-Field action.

2014-09-29 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:40:14AM +0900, YAMAMOTO Takashi wrote: > > The OpenFlow 1.5 (draft) Copy-Field action has two OXM headers, one after > > the other. Until now, Open vSwitch has implemented these as a pair of > > ovs_be32 membes, which meant that only 32-bit OXM could be supported. This

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 10/17] ofp-actions: Better support OXM in Copy-Field action.

2014-09-23 Thread YAMAMOTO Takashi
> The OpenFlow 1.5 (draft) Copy-Field action has two OXM headers, one after > the other. Until now, Open vSwitch has implemented these as a pair of > ovs_be32 membes, which meant that only 32-bit OXM could be supported. This members (i haven't reviewed the code as i have no access to OF1.5 draf

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 10/17] ofp-actions: Better support OXM in Copy-Field action.

2014-09-16 Thread Ben Pfaff
The OpenFlow 1.5 (draft) Copy-Field action has two OXM headers, one after the other. Until now, Open vSwitch has implemented these as a pair of ovs_be32 membes, which meant that only 32-bit OXM could be supported. This commit changes the implementation to use nx_pull_header(), which means that in