Thanks guys, series pushed to master,
Jarno
On May 28, 2014, at 4:55 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:52:59PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>> On May 28, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>>
>>> FWIW I'd prefer we don't mix declarations and code unless there's a
>>
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:52:59PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>
> > FWIW I'd prefer we don't mix declarations and code unless there's a
> > clear reason to do it from a simplicity perspective. I.E. I think we
> > should go from mandating
On May 28, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> FWIW I'd prefer we don't mix declarations and code unless there's a
> clear reason to do it from a simplicity perspective. I.E. I think we
> should go from mandating that it's never allowed, to suggesting that
> it's discouraged. The reason i
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 04:00:03PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> FWIW I'd prefer we don't mix declarations and code unless there's a
> clear reason to do it from a simplicity perspective. I.E. I think we
> should go from mandating that it's never allowed, to suggesting that
> it's discouraged. Th
FWIW I'd prefer we don't mix declarations and code unless there's a
clear reason to do it from a simplicity perspective. I.E. I think we
should go from mandating that it's never allowed, to suggesting that
it's discouraged. The reason is that most of the code doesn't do
these things, and there's
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 03:31:03PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >> As even the MSVC 2013 now supports the C99 mixing of declarations and
> >> code, we can now allow them i
On May 23, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> As even the MSVC 2013 now supports the C99 mixing of declarations and
>> code, we can now allow them in OVS code.
>>
>> GCC (at least some versions of it) require the -std=c99 op
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> As even the MSVC 2013 now supports the C99 mixing of declarations and
> code, we can now allow them in OVS code.
>
> GCC (at least some versions of it) require the -std=c99 option to not
> issue warnings, and since we rely in GCC e
As even the MSVC 2013 now supports the C99 mixing of declarations and
code, we can now allow them in OVS code.
GCC (at least some versions of it) require the -std=c99 option to not
issue warnings, and since we rely in GCC extensions when compiling
with GCC, the option -std=gnu99 is now added to th
