On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jun 8, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Andy Zhou wrote:
>
>>> What needs locking here? Could the locking be moved closer into the new
>>> function?
>>
>>
>> The conn member is declared with OVS_GUARDED in netdev_dummy. T
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 8, 2014, at 12:32 AM, Andy Zhou wrote:
>> What needs locking here? Could the locking be moved closer into the new
>> function?
>
>
> The conn member is declared with OVS_GUARDED in netdev_dummy. This is
> to make sure
> the mutex is held before accessing conn. A
>
> "connected"
Thanks, will fix.
>
>> +CONN_STATE_UNKNOWN,/* No relavent information. */
>> +};
>> +
>> struct dummy_packet_pconn {
>> struct pstream *pstream;
>> struct dummy_packet_stream *streams;
>> @@ -561,6 +568,24 @@ dummy_packet_conn_send(struct dummy_packet_conn *conn
See comments below,
Jarno
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 4:34 PM, Andy Zhou wrote:
>
> Using without any parameter, this command list the connection
> state of all netdev-dummy devices that are configured as passive
> listeners.
>
> Optionally, the name of the netdev-dummy device can be supplied
> as
Using without any parameter, this command list the connection
state of all netdev-dummy devices that are configured as passive
listeners.
Optionally, the name of the netdev-dummy device can be supplied
as a parameter.
The states will be displayed as:
"connected": The listening socket has been co
