On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:48:28PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:43:18PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:10:28AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > > Till now, rxbuf was only used
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 04:43:18PM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:10:28AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > > Till now, rxbuf was only used by the worker. An upcoming
> > > commit will have another client. So
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:10:28AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> > Till now, rxbuf was only used by the worker. An upcoming
> > commit will have another client. So carve out rxbuf from
> > the worker files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Gurucharan
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 01:10:28AM -0700, Gurucharan Shetty wrote:
> Till now, rxbuf was only used by the worker. An upcoming
> commit will have another client. So carve out rxbuf from
> the worker files.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
Thanks for doing this. We need a fix.
I don't see a
Till now, rxbuf was only used by the worker. An upcoming
commit will have another client. So carve out rxbuf from
the worker files.
Signed-off-by: Gurucharan Shetty
---
lib/automake.mk |2 ++
lib/rxbuf.c | 82 +++
lib/rxbuf.h |
