Hello Aaron,
On 25 January 2016 at 10:28, Aaron Conole wrote:
> Mauricio Vasquez B writes:
>
> > Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
> > error handling, port names as "dpdkr" or "dpdkr1x" are considered valid.
>
> Mauricio, thanks for the patch!
>
> > Signed-
Mauricio Vasquez B writes:
> Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
> error handling, port names as "dpdkr" or "dpdkr1x" are considered valid.
Mauricio, thanks for the patch!
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
> ---
> lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 22 ++
Current implementation of dpdk_dev_parse_name does not perform a robust
error handling, port names as "dpdkr" or "dpdkr1x" are considered valid.
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
lib/netdev-dpdk.c | 22 --
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib
