Sure I'll send a separate patch.
Ethan
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 16:40, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> In that case then can you make the corresponding change in
> lib/reconnect.c also?
>
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:57:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Yes it appears to fix the problem according to the un
In that case then can you make the corresponding change in
lib/reconnect.c also?
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 03:57:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Yes it appears to fix the problem according to the unit tests. It
> seems correct to fix it in both places to me though.
>
> Ethan
>
> On Fri, Apr 13
Yes it appears to fix the problem according to the unit tests. It
seems correct to fix it in both places to me though.
Ethan
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 15:53, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:02:09PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> The python reconnect library attempted to send a probe
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 10:02:09PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> The python reconnect library attempted to send a probe every 0
> milliseconds instead of disabling probing when the probe_interval
> was zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
I think that this changes the Idle state so that, if th
The python reconnect library attempted to send a probe every 0
milliseconds instead of disabling probing when the probe_interval
was zero.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
python/ovs/reconnect.py |8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/ovs/reconnect.
