On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:13 AM, Jesse Gross wrote:
> On Aug 29, 2011 3:56 PM, "Justin Pettit" wrote:
> >
> > There will be a caller added soon.
>
> Looks good, thanks.
Thanks. I'll push it when I get your ack on the next patch.
--Justin
___
dev maili
On Aug 29, 2011 3:56 PM, "Justin Pettit" wrote:
>
> There will be a caller added soon.
Looks good, thanks.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
There will be a caller added soon.
---
lib/netdev-linux.c | 54
lib/netdev-linux.h |7 ++
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-linux.c b/lib/netdev-linux.c
index 05b830c..838dac6 100644
--- a/lib/n
On Aug 18, 2011, at 9:28 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> Regarding ETHTOOL_GFLAGS and ETHTOOL_SFLAGS, usually I add #ifndef
> around definitions for macros that might be defined in system headers.
> I guess that it's unlikely that these would be defined differently in
> system header, though.
That's fair.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 07:01:53PM -0700, Justin Pettit wrote:
> There will be a caller added soon.
Regarding ETHTOOL_GFLAGS and ETHTOOL_SFLAGS, usually I add #ifndef
around definitions for macros that might be defined in system headers.
I guess that it's unlikely that these would be defined diffe
There will be a caller added soon.
---
lib/netdev-linux.c | 28
lib/netdev-linux.h |8
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/netdev-linux.c b/lib/netdev-linux.c
index 05b830c..409f8b9 100644
--- a/lib/netdev-linux.c
+++ b/li
