On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 03:25:58PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> As you noted earlier, CMAP_FOR_EACH and CMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE now are
> basically the same thing, the only difference being on that safe does
> the advance before calling the body. You considered merging them
> before?
Sure. Here's a
As you noted earlier, CMAP_FOR_EACH and CMAP_FOR_EACH_SAFE now are basically
the same thing, the only difference being on that safe does the advance before
calling the body. You considered merging them before?
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
On Jul 19, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> CMAP_FO
CMAP_FOR_EACH and CLS_FOR_EACH and their variants tried to use void ** as
a "pointer to any kind of pointer". That is a violation of the aliasing
rules in ISO C which technically yields undefined behavior. With GCC 4.1,
it causes both warnings and actual misbehavior. One option would to add
-fno
