Guru,
Your summary is exactly what I was thinking.
Mickey
-Guru Shetty wrote: -
To: Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
From: Guru Shetty
Date: 04/07/2016 11:05AM
Cc: ovs dev , Shi Xin Ruan
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add Static route to logical router
On 7 April 2016 at 01
On 7 April 2016 at 01:43, Mickey Spiegel wrote:
> See comments inline
>
> Mickey
>
>
> -Guru Shetty wrote: -
> >To: Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
> >From: Guru Shetty
> >Date: 04/06/2016 05:58PM
> >Cc: ovs dev , Shi Xin Ruan
> >Sub
See comments inline
Mickey
-Guru Shetty wrote: -
>To: Mickey Spiegel/San Jose/IBM@IBMUS
>From: Guru Shetty
>Date: 04/06/2016 05:58PM
>Cc: ovs dev , Shi Xin Ruan
>Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add Static route to logical router
>
>
>
>On 6 April 20
>
>
>
> Steve My understanding of last point,
> 1. How to static routes?
> format: "10.0.0.0/24 nexthop 10.1.1.1" or "10.0.0.0/24 nexthop 10.1.1.1
> dev port1"
> For the latter format, it need the networking-ovn to lookup logical router
> port table.
> It will do what this patch did in ovn-nort
gt; For these reasons, I prefer to keep a separate table for static routes.
> >
> > Mickey
> >
> >
> > -"dev" wrote: -
> > To: Shi Xin Ruan
> > From: Guru Shetty
> > Sent by: "dev"
> > Date: 04/04/2016 08:41AM
> >
or static routes.
>
> Mickey
>
>
> -"dev" wrote: -----
> To: Shi Xin Ruan
> From: Guru Shetty
> Sent by: "dev"
> Date: 04/04/2016 08:41AM
> Cc: ovs dev
> Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add Static route to logical router
>
> On 31 Ma
ate table for static routes.
Mickey
-"dev" wrote: -
To: Shi Xin Ruan
From: Guru Shetty
Sent by: "dev"
Date: 04/04/2016 08:41AM
Cc: ovs dev
Subject: Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add Static route to logical router
On 31 March 2016 at 19:11, Shi Xin Ruan wrote:
&g
On 31 March 2016 at 19:11, Shi Xin Ruan wrote:
> Thanks Guru.
>
> The column "valid" will indicate whether the routes has been transfer into
> logical flow.
> Thinking about this case, deleting the logical router port which is out
> going interface of some static routes.
> The first possible way
On 30 March 2016 at 19:36, Shi Xin Ruan wrote:
>
> This patch add static route to logical router which are required in many
> scenarios, such as VPNaas service, l3 gateway.
> For VPNaas, OVN logical router SHOULD be able to route the VPN remote
> subnet to the
> VPN VM, static route is the best c
This patch add static route to logical router which are required in many
scenarios, such as VPNaas service, l3 gateway.
For VPNaas, OVN logical router SHOULD be able to route the VPN remote
subnet to the
VPN VM, static route is the best choice.
This patach will add a new pointer array in "Logical
10 matches
Mail list logo