On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:38:47PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
On Apr 9, 2014, at 1:26 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>>
>> On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:38:47PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
Masked set actions add a mask, immediately following
On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 01:24:07PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:38:47PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> >> Masked set actions add a mask, immediately following the netlink
> >> attribute data, within the netlink
On Apr 9, 2014, at 10:51 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:38:47PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
>> Masked set actions add a mask, immediately following the netlink
>> attribute data, within the netlink attribute itself. Thus the key
>> attribute size for a masked set action is
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:38:47PM -0700, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Masked set actions add a mask, immediately following the netlink
> attribute data, within the netlink attribute itself. Thus the key
> attribute size for a masked set action is exactly double of the
> non-masked set action.
>
> Si
Masked set actions add a mask, immediately following the netlink
attribute data, within the netlink attribute itself. Thus the key
attribute size for a masked set action is exactly double of the
non-masked set action.
Signed-off-by: Jarno Rajahalme
---
lib/odp-execute.c | 241 +