Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 02/11] datapath: Account for now exposed VXLAN definitions

2015-01-30 Thread Thomas Graf
On 01/29/15 at 07:45pm, Pravin Shelar wrote: > > +#ifdef HAVE_NET_VXLAN_H > > #include_next > > +#endif > > + > > I do not see need for HAVE_NET_VXLAN_H. Is current check not working? Nothing wrong. We just don't include in some cases when it is available. I changed it back to USE_KERNEL_TUNNE

Re: [ovs-dev] [PATCH 02/11] datapath: Account for now exposed VXLAN definitions

2015-01-29 Thread Pravin Shelar
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Thomas Graf wrote: > This brings the compat version of vxlan_udp_encap_recv() and > vxlan_xmit_skb() in line with upstream commit: > > commit 3bf3947526c1053ddf2523f261395d682718f56c > Author: Tom Herbert > Date: Thu Jan 8 12:31:18 2015 -

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 02/11] datapath: Account for now exposed VXLAN definitions

2015-01-27 Thread Thomas Graf
This brings the compat version of vxlan_udp_encap_recv() and vxlan_xmit_skb() in line with upstream commit: commit 3bf3947526c1053ddf2523f261395d682718f56c Author: Tom Herbert Date: Thu Jan 8 12:31:18 2015 -0800 vxlan: Improve support for header flags This patc

[ovs-dev] [PATCH 02/11] datapath: Account for now exposed VXLAN definitions

2015-01-22 Thread Thomas Graf
This brings the compat version of vxlan_udp_encap_recv() and vxlan_xmit_skb() in line with upstream commit: commit 3bf3947526c1053ddf2523f261395d682718f56c Author: Tom Herbert Date: Thu Jan 8 12:31:18 2015 -0800 vxlan: Improve support for header flags This patc