> On Mar 5, 2015, at 1:12 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:58:33PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>>
>> I checked out a new tree and applied the patch, and it worked fine for me.
>> I didn't move "vtep/vtep.ovsschema" from where it was before the patch, so I
>> don't know why
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:58:33PM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>
> > On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:04:29AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> >> There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
> >> "libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it t
> On Mar 5, 2015, at 8:58 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:04:29AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
>> There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
>> "libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it to "vtep" and includes it in
>> a new "libvtep.la".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ju
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 12:04:29AM -0800, Justin Pettit wrote:
> There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
> "libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it to "vtep" and includes it in
> a new "libvtep.la".
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
I get a build failure when I apply this:
There's no reason to build it in "lib" and include it in
"libopenvswitch.la". This commit moves it to "vtep" and includes it in
a new "libvtep.la".
Signed-off-by: Justin Pettit
---
lib/.gitignore|3 ---
lib/automake.mk | 15 +--
lib/vtep-idl.ann |9 -
vtep/.