Great, I've merged it. Thanks for reporting it.
Ethan
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Murphy McCauley
wrote:
> On May 22, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:57:19AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>>> As a result of commit a0bab87 (ofproto: Remove per-flow miss ha
On May 22, 2014, at 1:39 PM, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:57:19AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> As a result of commit a0bab87 (ofproto: Remove per-flow miss hash
>> table from upcall handler.) we're guaranteed that every packet has had
>> xlate_actions() called on it at least on
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:57:19AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> As a result of commit a0bab87 (ofproto: Remove per-flow miss hash
> table from upcall handler.) we're guaranteed that every packet has had
> xlate_actions() called on it at least once. Therefore, there's no
> need to re-xlate slow pa
[Adding Murphy]
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 10:57:19AM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> As a result of commit a0bab87 (ofproto: Remove per-flow miss hash
> table from upcall handler.) we're guaranteed that every packet has had
> xlate_actions() called on it at least once. Therefore, there's no
> need to
As a result of commit a0bab87 (ofproto: Remove per-flow miss hash
table from upcall handler.) we're guaranteed that every packet has had
xlate_actions() called on it at least once. Therefore, there's no
need to re-xlate slow path flows just to shove their packets through
the system.
This also may
