Thanks,
Daniele
On 8/6/14, 11:07 AM, "Jarno Rajahalme" wrote:
>Daniele,
>
>Thanks for spotting these. GCC error message may be cryptic, but using an
>atomic variable as the return value is an error regardless.
>
>Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
>
>Pushed to master,
>
> Jarno
>
>On Aug 6, 2014, at 1
Daniele,
Thanks for spotting these. GCC error message may be cryptic, but using an
atomic variable as the return value is an error regardless.
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Pushed to master,
Jarno
On Aug 6, 2014, at 10:35 AM, Daniele Di Proietto wrote:
> There's no reason for the local varia
There's no reason for the local variable 'old_count' to be atomic. In fact, if
it is atomic it triggers a GCC4.9 warning (Wunused-value)
The global variables 'a' and 'paux' could be static, according to sparse.
Signed-off-by: Daniele Di Proietto
---
There's something interesting about the warning
