On 7 September 2016 at 14:23, Jarno Rajahalme wrote:
> Assuming the test is otherwise identical,
>
> Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
Yup, it's just 's/10.1.1.240/10.1.1.9/' and
's/0x0a0101f0\/0xfff0/0x0a010109/0x/' plus a test rename.
Thanks, applied to master.
I plan to follow up shortl
Assuming the test is otherwise identical,
Acked-by: Jarno Rajahalme
> On Sep 7, 2016, at 2:07 PM, Joe Stringer wrote:
>
> The existing FTP with NAT tests all perform NATing from an IP like
> 10.1.1.1 -> 10.1.1.240, which requires adjusting the length of FTP
> control messages as they pass thro
The existing FTP with NAT tests all perform NATing from an IP like
10.1.1.1 -> 10.1.1.240, which requires adjusting the length of FTP
control messages as they pass through the connection tracker.
Occasionally this is a source of kernel bugs, so it is useful to have a
regular FTP NAT test between IP