On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 04:55:54PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > I'd be happier to have this and the corresponding Python change in a
> > single commit, or as a second choice to at least mention in the commit
> > log that the corresponding change was just made.
>
> That's fine with me. I'll fol
> I'd be happier to have this and the corresponding Python change in a
> single commit, or as a second choice to at least mention in the commit
> log that the corresponding change was just made.
That's fine with me. I'll fold it in. I can resend the entire think
if you'd like.
Ethan
>
> Thanks
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:10:20PM -0700, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> This patch doesn't actually fix a bug, but it seems more consistent
> to ignore this value when it's zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
I'd be happier to have this and the corresponding Python change in a
single commit, or as a
This patch doesn't actually fix a bug, but it seems more consistent
to ignore this value when it's zero.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
lib/reconnect.c |5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/reconnect.c b/lib/reconnect.c
index 7737fcf..c750007 100644
---
