Thanks, I've merged this.
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 13:47, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:40:48PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
>> Good Idea, how about something like this?
>
> Sure, that seems fine.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
ht
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:40:48PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> Good Idea, how about something like this?
Sure, that seems fine.
___
dev mailing list
dev@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
Good Idea, how about something like this?
---
python/ovs/db/idl.py |7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/python/ovs/db/idl.py b/python/ovs/db/idl.py
index 57495f5..b33d9f8 100644
--- a/python/ovs/db/idl.py
+++ b/python/ovs/db/idl.py
@@ -1092,10 +1092,13 @@
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 01:30:02PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> > Will you convert the existing Idl clients in the tree to use this new
> > class?
>
> Sure, do you mind if I do it a bit later as I convert the python
> daemons to using the new unixctl library. That way I only have to
> test them
> Will you convert the existing Idl clients in the tree to use this new
> class?
Sure, do you mind if I do it a bit later as I convert the python
daemons to using the new unixctl library. That way I only have to
test them once.
> Should we continue to support the older form?
I don't feel strong
On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 06:55:27PM -0800, Ethan Jackson wrote:
> The new SchemaHelper class makes it easier to prune database
> schemas intended for the Python IDL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
Will you convert the existing Idl clients in the tree to use this new
class?
Should we continue t
The new SchemaHelper class makes it easier to prune database
schemas intended for the Python IDL.
Signed-off-by: Ethan Jackson
---
python/ovs/db/idl.py | 71 +-
1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/python/ovs/db/idl.py b/
